Post: #1

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/h...-till-case

Here's an interesting article about Emmett Till's accuser. She's divorced twice and recently admitted that she made up of the testimony in the trial of Till's murderers, who got off in spite of a confession. Here's a refresher if you don't know:

Quote:On a steamy hot September day in 1955, in a racially segregated courtroom in Sumner, Mississippi, two white men, J.W. Milam and his half-brother Roy Bryant—a country-store owner—were acquitted of the murder of a 14-year-old black Chicago boy. His name was Emmett Till. And in August of that year, while visiting a Deep South that he didn’t understand, Till had entered a store to buy two cents worth of bubble gum. Shortly after exiting, he likely whistled at Bryant’s 21-year-old wife, Carolyn. Enraged, Bryant and Milam took matters into their own hands. They would later admit to local authorities that they’d abducted Till three nights later. And when they finished with him, his body was so hideously disfigured from having been bludgeoned and shot that its horrifying depiction—in a photo in Jet magazine—would help to propel the American civil rights movement.

Quote:In a new book, The Blood of Emmett Till (Simon & Schuster), Timothy Tyson, a Duke University senior research scholar, reveals that Carolyn—in 2007, at age 72—confessed that she had fabricated the most sensational part of her testimony.

So, this woman lied and got an innocent 14-year-old boy killed by two ignorant rednecks in the Deep South.

It should also be noted that Timothy Tyson doesn't side with all men falsely accused by women. He was a villain during the Duke lacrosse fiasco. But it's not a surprise that Till's accuser lied about it. And back in 1955, whites were more "evil" than "men."

Post: #2

Wut?!

Post: #3

White women have been hollering rape on black men for several decades. Nowadays they holler on white men all the same. Look at all the black men freed on DNA evidence in the Information Age we live in. If you are old enough as a black man, like myself, your mother probably told you to keep your distance from white girls when you were a small boy for this exact same reason. My mother used to all but beat us if we were anywhere near the sisters of our white friends growing up. This rape culture stuff today isn't anything new at all. They use the college campus because it is easier to ruin a man there with no evidence, but back in the day, no evidence was needed to accuse a black man.

Feminist white women started doing this the minute we got the right to vote before them as payback. It was easy to divide white men against black men by exploiting our weakness of seeing things on a color basis. If that was not a factor, their fake cries of rape would have fell on deaf ears.

Black people's reality predicted the White man's current state just like Excelsior wrote about years ago. It's no surprise she lied. Everyone knew she did, but back then, white was right, no matter what the circumstance. As a result the white man's women are now subjugating them with the tyranny of false claims.

It's a stark reminder to all men, that fighting each other, over skin color, is a fools errand. Masculinity and Patriarchy is for all men that live in your society. Failure to unite, will ensure Feminism's ability to maintain power and thrive.

Post: #4

@ TravelerKai:

When I was a university student in Toronto, a Canadian-Jamaican peer told me that white women want to be on top, or at least equal to the Top 10% of white man.

Plus, I can notice how my Canadian-born Jamaica friend was scared like he was about to be shot when I recited Dancehall lyrics on the school corridor with the words "pussy" & "fuck" near a group of white snobby chicks who are feminazi lesbians for sure.

Even assuring him that "no one will understand a fucking word I said just now", but he warned me to be quiet.

Another time I was ranting on the street how another university has a picture of Gloria Steinem or some shit at their building, but we were behind a white Jewess feminazi Faculty Administrator, and he directed me to be quiet again.

Overall, campus life in Toronto was DEFCOCK0.5, that I would never attend university in Toronto if you paid me $50,000 a year to study all over again.

It was the 21st century of Jim Crow that I experienced on that campus in Toronto, with a touch of elitist aristocracy.

If Emmett Till were alive today & attending university in Canada, he will be falsely accused of rape & publicly shamed like Roosh, and the finale is that Emmett Till would probably end up being brutally executed on the street by a white knight lynch mob or thug in blue, but the media will justify it was "Emmett Till was a rape supporter who is devoted to Roosh" or some shit.

Canadian media will only show sympathy of a colored man if he is a gang-banger who assists with selling drugs for the white community, or if he is a welfare dependent to the white state, but if he dares show independence and goes out of line (like Senator Meredith who fucked an 18-year-old "teenage girl"), the colored man is vilified to the death until he is a penniless vagrant with a bad reputation.

Post: #5

Oh yea, to mention that a high-standing Black British man of Caribbean heritage was, or was about, or threatened to be falsely accused of rape by another female faculty member at that other university Ryerson university back in 2014.

He told one of my friends that he resorted to notifying security and police up-front that he will be falsely accused of shit by a woman, so that if the woman causes a scene and police involvement, probably because to protect himself from being shot to death by police.
University-Toronto, Ryerson University and York University are warped with that subtle anti-Black racist feministe theory.

Post: #6

Wasnt whistling at a white woman in those days asking for trouble?

Post: #7

He should have sung this song instead:

Post: #8

I'm convinced there's a particular reason that there has not been and will never be another criminal trial in connection with young Till's death.
It's because the trial and verdict permanently etched SOMETHING onto the psyche of the nation. The THING that is meant to last forever is the psychic effects of the pure injustice, following the heinous racist crime.
I suggest that the psychic effects are different for whites and blacks. Despite the effects being different for whites and blacks, the effects are intended to equally (pun not intended) and contemporaneously persist in perpetuity.

PS Carolyn Bryant is worthless scum. A sorry excuse for a human being

Post: #9

(05-03-2017 05:16 AM)brick tamland Wrote:  I'm convinced there's a particular reason that there has not been and will never be another criminal trial in connection with young Till's death.

It happened 62 years ago. Can we realistically have a trial now?

Post: #10

(05-02-2017 11:21 PM)Chris Brown Wrote:  Wasnt whistling at a white woman in those days asking for trouble?

You think that actually even happened?

Even the article says he "likely whistled". Bitch made the entire thing up, as women are known to do.

Post: #11

@puckerman. I haven't looked too deeply into the case. Here are some interesting facts I found online. Anyone else with more knowledge could add more, or correct my understanding or errors.

Till's remains were only exhumed a few years ago. When he died, an autopsy was not performed. One of the pillars of the defence's case was that it could not be proved that it was Till who had been pulled out of the water. Hence it couldn't be proved that the two accused were the killers. The jury was swayed by this line of reasoning.

Why wasn't he exhumed and positively identified as soon as reasonably possible after DNA evidence had become admissible in criminal trials. I believe this occurred sometime in the 1980's (?).
At that stage, there should have been some living witnesses or even the perps. There were apparently more than two perps responsible for the killing.

Bryant lied to the FBI recently regarding the circumstances of the incident. Lying to an FBI investigator is a crime, but the statute of limitations kicked in before she made the disclosure which is the subject of this thread.

Bryant has written memoirs that will not be made available until her death at the earliest. There surely must be a way for investigators to take possession of her writings, as they probably contain meaningful revelations. Her memoir seems to be one of the final 'warm' trails that could be pursued, yet the entire case has stalled.

Even if all the perps have died, wouldn't an in absentia conviction of the 2, or 3 or more rumoured killers be better than nothing, assuming there is a legal provision that allows for an in absentia criminal trial and conviction?
Even a symbolic civil damages award, similar to the one awarded to the family of Martin Luther King in 1999 would be better than nothing.