Post: #26

(01-20-2019 02:13 AM)Adolf Hitler Wrote:  Die Juden sind unser Unglück. Sie haben ihre jüdischen Lakaien geschickt, um das Leiden auf RooshV zu lassen.

Die kanadische Jüdin Lena Dunham ist verantwortlich für eine zionistische und feministische Kampagne, um alle in Kanada lebenden heterosexuellen Männer zu befreien.

Herr Führer, ich glaube Sie wollten 'versklaven' gesagt haben.

Die kanadische Jüdin Lena Dunham ist verantwortlich für eine zionistische und feministische Kampagne, um alle in Kanada lebenden heterosexuellen Männer zu versklaven.

Oder, Herr Führer??! Manche sagen, dass Sie selber drin nicht so ganz rein seien, und sogar jüdsiches Blut haben!

Post: #27

Silver linings.
Now the RVF can readily say they've banned Adolf Hitler...

Post: #28

Their outfits...in Sombrero and Poncho...

Post: #29

She's been going at it for a while now, pushing the bar a bit higher with her crazy antics. Now I'm kinda concerned about her mental health status, bitch is about to have an autistic Alt-Right screeching session any moment now.....

Post: #30

From "oy vey" to "aye carumba" ?

Post: #31

She is completely insane, but I still think she's hilarious.

Post: #32

(01-31-2019 06:32 AM)ChefAllDay Wrote:  She is completely insane, but I still think she's hilarious.

Yep, too insane for CPAC.

Post: #33

Another data point illustrating that the Conservatives are not our friends. Politicians take their orders from the political donor class, and merely put on the outfits of the demographics they claim to represent.

Democrats don't actually care about Black people.
Republicans don't actually care about White people.
CPAC doesn't actually care about conservatism.

Post: #34

(03-03-2019 10:24 AM)Aurini Wrote:  Another data point illustrating that the Conservatives are not our friends. Politicians take their orders from the political donor class, and merely put on the outfits of the demographics they claim to represent.

Democrats don't actually care about Black people.
Republicans don't actually care about White people.
CPAC doesn't actually care about conservatism.

So true.

The irony here though is that even the official CPAC opposition is controlled, Loomer cares even less about White people or conservatism than your average CPAC hack. She's a bigger whore than the run-of-the-mill cucks, who to their credit are a lot more dupes than evil operatives.

CPAC will let through some "rebels" like Michelle Malkin, who will use their podium to give the appearance of rocking the boat, but whithout ever straying outside of Cuckland. So she'll go on and have a nice rant about immigration, saying how something has to be done about it, but will never go into the cultural and political motives of those who have been pushing third world mass immigration into the West for the last 50 years. There won't be any mentions of Javits or Kalergi in her new book about immigration, she will only regurgitate the spiel about "leftists" and "liberals" that her Fox Boomer cuck audience has been conditioned to fixate on for the last 20 years.

Post: #35

Maybe that's where the alt-right went so desperately wrong.

They should have declared a general holy jihad against the cuckservatives and followed through while simultaneously enjoying the ugly position it would put the left in, being forced to defend all those horrible, rich old white men from the Nazis.

I don't speak French but I'd bet my freedom-toast that there's no shortage of boomer cuckservatives over there desperately calling for the yellow vests to go home.

Post: #36

Is it just me that's wondering how Loomer is going to generate attention after being de-platformed?

I think Jack got really mad that she protested at his house.

But seriously:

Post: #37

^^^^

Here's the irony about Laura Loomer wanting "attention."

Had she put out a series of photos showing her butt in a thong bikini and showing off her nipples in sheet t-shirts, she'd still have an account. But since she put forth "incorrect" ideas, she's banned.

Even if this was about attention for her initially, it's evolved into something different for us all because of their selective banning. As someone said on the Paul Joseph Watson thread, people are gonna have to go back to making their own Web sites if they want to get points across, because the gatekeepers are tyrannical...and arbitrary.

Post: #38

(05-03-2019 08:15 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  ^^^^

Here's the irony about Laura Loomer wanting "attention."

Had she put out a series of photos showing her butt in a thong bikini and showing off her nipples in sheet t-shirts, she'd still have an account. But since she put forth "incorrect" ideas, she's banned.

Even if this was about attention for her initially, it's evolved into something different for us all because of their selective banning. As someone said on the Paul Joseph Watson thread, people are gonna have to go back to making their own Web sites if they want to get points across, because the gatekeepers are tyrannical...and arbitrary.

It looks like your theory is correct... This didn't appear to get her banned:

Post: #39

a woman's currency is male attention.

truly pathetic.

Post: #40

(05-03-2019 08:39 PM)Rorogue Wrote:  a woman's currency is male attention.

truly pathetic.

The worst social media trend I've seen recently is these posts, "i'm not perfect, etc" after some influencer talked about the need to be perfect for instagram despite having all these flaws.

All these women jumped on the bandwagon with "makeup-free" selfies (completely load of rubbish bc they had foundation on), so they could get likes based off this new trend of "instagram authenticity".

Post: #41

Loomer is having a tough go after getting banned from Instagram and Facebook:



The emotional portion is at 12:40..

Post: #42

Would marry Laura Loomer, not lying she's more credible than other women on the right. Plus I always loved her humor, very much a female Alex Jones. I'll also say, I'm sick and tired of people punching right, especially when it's people more successful than them. Martina Markota I lost ALL respect for since she more or less said: "I don't care, seek help." Martina went through the same shit and should realize she was fucking lucky not to end up like Loomer.

Post: #43

(05-04-2019 11:28 AM)partyfowl Wrote:  Would marry Laura Loomer, not lying she's more credible than other women on the right. Plus I always loved her humor, very much a female Alex Jones.

A sassy, anti feminist Jew girl is pretty hot.
I had one years ago

Post: #44

(05-04-2019 11:33 AM)Rorogue Wrote:  

(05-04-2019 11:28 AM)partyfowl Wrote:  Would marry Laura Loomer, not lying she's more credible than other women on the right. Plus I always loved her humor, very much a female Alex Jones.

A sassy, anti feminist Jew girl is pretty hot.
I had one years ago

Same here, a long time ago. She was so into me but she was so afraid that she would be disowned so we never fully connected

Post: #45

I feel for her. My YouTube was deleted for a completely fabricated reason (they claimed I was spamming comments), my Twitter is on shadowban, and the response of most so-called right wingers is to avert their gaze or crack jokes. I'll be tossing her some cash once I'm working again.

Post: #46

(05-04-2019 11:41 AM)Aurini Wrote:  I feel for her. My YouTube was deleted for a completely fabricated reason (they claimed I was spamming comments), my Twitter is on shadowban, and the response of most so-called right wingers is to avert their gaze or crack jokes. I'll be tossing her some cash once I'm working again.

You and me both brother. Plus the right wing crabs are already pulling her down into the bucket. People are already calling her a "sociopath that deserved this."

Post: #47

I have sympathy for anyone whose heart is in the right place but all these conserva-celebrities...

...where did they ever think this was going to end up?

Loomer, you're not dead. You're not starving to death in a concentration camp suffering from a fatal bout of dysentery. You're not freezing to death in a forest trying to flee communist death-squads. You're not being forced to triage which of your children gets to eat and which gets to sleep the long sleep. You're not being gang-raped by foreign imperialist soldiers.

We've got a long way to go before we hit the bottom and if your limit of suffering is "I can't make a living getting attention on the internet" then be glad you had a decent run while you did. Change your identity and try to live as much of a life as you can before shit gets worse, because it will.

Why do I get the sneaking suspicion that it's all about the attention for so many of these i-celebs.

Try to imagine a world where every damned person in it hates you and wants you dead because of what you believe. If you can't imagine soldiering on in that situation then it's probably best just to keep your mouth shut.

Post: #48

(05-04-2019 11:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I have sympathy for anyone whose heart is in the right place but all these conserva-celebrities...

...where did they ever think this was going to end up?

Loomer, you're not dead. You're not starving to death in a concentration camp suffering from a fatal bout of dysentery. You're not freezing to death in a forest trying to flee communist death-squads. You're not being forced to triage which of your children gets to eat and which gets to sleep the long sleep. You're not being gang-raped by foreign imperialist soldiers.

We've got a long way to go before we hit the bottom and if your limit of suffering is "I can't make a living getting attention on the internet" then be glad you had a decent run while you did. Change your identity and try to live as much of a life as you can before shit gets worse, because it will.

I can see your point however given the fact Loomer's tame compared to others who have been similarly deplatformed I would just as terrified as Loomer. She's not in a hell of her own creation like TRS, Richard Spencer or Christopher Cantwell who COULDN'T shut up when it would've been smart for them to just lie low.

Post: #49

Perhaps it would have been pointless but what did the alt-right tell the alt-light about big-tech censorship?

"They'll come for you soon enough".

Now long after the alt-light threw the alt-right under the bus the hardcore totalitarians are putting down their conservative lap-dogs like Loomer and PJW.

We reap what we sow. Always.

Post: #50

Oh, believe me, one of the earliest signs that this whole 'movement' was doomed from the start was how popular all the Female Libertarian Bloggers were, compared to their male counterparts; I feel you on the tradthots. I never subscribed to any of them, because there's nothing a woman can teach me that will make me a better man.*

*Female friends can help be become a better person by reflecting for me - but I don't need to hear a woman who's never carried a rifle in service to her country tell me about how politics ought to work.

That said, it's critical that we do all we can to keep our lines of communication open. Yes, I have faith in God and in the power of Truth - they'll never silence us completely. Even if they were to kill all of us, a new generation of truth speakers would arise. They can silence us, but they can't kill the truth. Be that as it may, God helps those who help themselves. It's our duty, as lovers of the truth, to keep the communication lines free and open.

As to the above mentioned idiots - those fools were giving the left every excuse to ban them, and start the banning process. They played right into their hands, making obnoxious and vexatious statements. Even if you agreed with them, they were saying things in such a childish, disruptive manner that you'd want them to shut up. That was the opening salvo. Now the censors have taken the gloves off, and they're going after anyone they disagree with, regardless of justification. The initial idiots justified the development of these weapons of censorship - and now those weapons are being turned on everyone else.

Loomer has had her faux-pas' - all of us who've had a public presence have - but she's been one of the good ones. She isn't a Blair White or a Shoe on Head, spouting an inconsistent agenda for the sake of appealing to incels. She's been as consistent as the best of us, and has contributed to the overall movement.

Is she a fame whore? You have to be, or else nobody hears your message, so what's the point? Is she an egotist? Again, you have to be to do this sort of thing.

It's worth noting that they're not done with her, merely kicking her off of social media; now they're trying to go after her and Alex Jones' ability to send text messages through whatsapp. This is total information censorship - and you'd better believe they're coming for us as well, not just shutting down this forum and our websites, but shutting down our bank accounts, our phones, maybe even our ability to access the internet.

If that happens, I'll survive; I always survive. But that doesn't mean it's a good thing.

President Trump is 'monitoring' this situation. I spoke to the only man worthy of being Prime Minister in this country who's running, and while he seems to be a good guy, he has no idea how the Internet works. It's up to us to fight this battle, and Loomer's putting her money where her mouth is.

Is she the leader I would have chosen? No. But if she's taking those first steps into no man's land, I'll have her back.