Post: #76

(04-19-2016 12:02 PM)kaotic Wrote:  I guess I'll never understand this, organic is the way to go.

Not to mention the thrill of the hunt and taking risks.

I could never use a flesh light or some shit like this.

Would you let a girl use a fleshlight on you if to only satisfy her curiosity?

Post: #77

(04-19-2016 12:23 PM)porscheguy Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 12:02 PM)kaotic Wrote:  I guess I'll never understand this, organic is the way to go.

Not to mention the thrill of the hunt and taking risks.

I could never use a flesh light or some shit like this.

Would you let a girl use a fleshlight on you if to only satisfy her curiosity?

I've never been asked, and it's hard for her to request that when my dick is tickling the back of her throat.

The only curiosity I've witnessed in wanting BDSM to go more further past tying up and whipping.

It's alot different when a girl asks for a clit massager to be used on her, then her to use a flesh light on you.

I've never heard of a guy getting jacked off by a fleshlight by a girl.

Women love being dominated in bed, so I think most wouldn't request that unless they're a Dominatrix.

You're dominating them, you're doing what you want, and making sure you fuck them good in the process.

When you do that, you get into a girls mind, just be careful not to get to deep, it's hard getting out.

Post: #78

(04-19-2016 12:30 PM)kaotic Wrote:  When you do that, you get into a girls mind, just be careful not to get to deep, it's hard getting out.

What happens if you cum inside?

G

Post: #79

(04-19-2016 12:30 PM)kaotic Wrote:  I've never heard of a guy getting jacked off by a fleshlight by a girl.

I doubt you're dating unfeminine women who aren't obsessed with trying to win your approval.

Some of my mates are dumpster divers: they have that natural Australian aversion to effort, so even though they're fit, they'll date down. I've heard stories. I think sometimes the girls are feeling lazy that night and don't want to put the effort in, because they're not that into the guys, so they'll suggest a 'fun game' with a fleshlight.

Or there's a case like his:

A girl I know recently-finalised her divorce, and she's had a crush on a biker mate of mine since high school. I was talking to him the phone yesterday and he was telling me how she got his number off someone and rang him to ask him out, which happens a lot to him. The date ended in bed, as I'd expect. (He taught me how to make any girl reliably-squirt back in my teens. I've got to say, I owe the guy).

So he's banging away, has blown a couple of times, says he's 'fucking her up the walls', when she suddenly tells him to stop. He's not sure what's going on, but she asks him if he's got a toy, and when he says she does, she jacks him off with it, but then clears out very quickly after he blows for the last time.

He rings her the next day, testing the waters, and he says come over and I'll cook dinner tonight. She's initially reticent, but agrees.

He's banging her again, same thing happens: "Stop, stop!" Then she's heading for his drawer to get his toy.

This time he stops her and says "Look, what is going on."

She pointed at his hardon. "Are you like this, ALL THE TIME?"

He asked her what she meant, and she explained that she's a 35 year old woman who has never been with a man who lasted more than two minutes before, and she just can't handle the intensity. It's not that it's bad - it feels really good - but it's just too much for her pussy to handle, so she wanted to finish him off with the toy again.

He was asking my opinion because he was really thrown by this, and I had to explain to him that, yeah, there's various studies on how long guys last in sex, and guys like him and I would be considered highly-abnormal.

He seemed really put off, until I explained that "You know how girls are always ringing out of the blue to ask you out? That's not normal either. Word gets around."

As for the Autoblow: why is anyone taking the advertising pitch of a sex toy seriously? I guarantee you the same industry describes this as 'lifelike' and 'realistic':



I guess I wasn't paying attention the first time around. This 'toy' is $240 Australian Dollars! I doubt I've ever spent that much in my life during the process of getting into a chicks pants. I could do that in my teenage years with no greater financial layout than a packet of Hubba Bubba and a Grape Slush Puppy. Besides, it's gonna feel cold, rubbery and dry, so you're going to need a tonne of lube to get any traction. Basically, you're paying $240 to - at best - simulate sex with an Old Age Pensioner.



TEAM ORGANIC

Post: #80

(04-19-2016 12:20 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  This thing is going to sell well, if the company was publicly traded I would buy stock. This blow job machine now is like the Sidekick was in 2004. In 2004 the Sidekick was the predecessor to the smartphones we all use now,this blow job machine is the first in a long line of progressively better male Sexual gratification technology.

Women laugh at it now, but as technology progresses it will cease to be funny. VR is just the beginning, actual sex robots is the ending. Once the sex robots can talk, kiss, be affectionate - basically be the Disney girl we were raised to believe in, with incredibly nasty sex involving every orifice- women are in trouble. The only reason to want a real woman in that case is children, and the legal system in this county is not providing men any incentives to reproduce.....

Agreed. Furthermore, against the possible objection that VR technology - including sexbots - cannot provide the genuinely empathic, human interaction that women can provide, I would point out that women in the Anglosphere are already significantly devoid of empathy and warmth, such that most men wouldn't even miss this aspect of the sex in any case, although they certainly will be happy that Ms Sexbot doesn't sport a self-centred, cunty attitude.

Post: #81

There is only one man of the RVF to review this product, and he is delicioustacos.

He wrote this review about a fucksleeve, largely considered his magnum opus:

https://delicioustacos.com/2013/04/29/pr...ina-silky/

I'm sure the Autoblow 2 will inspire a worthy sequel (in spirit) to the Tenga review.

Post: #82

I too support purchasing this for delicous tacos to reveiw for RVF.

Post: #83

I even don't know what is more disturbing - this machine or song ...

something is timing out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kM6gCqhtxyQ

Post: #84

(04-19-2016 05:45 PM)Feldeinsamkeit Wrote:  Agreed. Furthermore, against the possible objection that VR technology - including sexbots - cannot provide the genuinely empathic, human interaction that women can provide, I would point out that women in the Anglosphere are already significantly devoid of empathy and warmth, such that most men wouldn't even miss this aspect of the sex in any case, although they certainly will be happy that Ms Sexbot doesn't sport a self-centred, cunty attitude.

I fear that we are a bit too late for the truly realistic (or at least 99%) robot technology. I guess the next best thing is to get down to SEA, get a few regulars and teach them well.

Post: #85

(04-18-2016 06:32 PM)Roosh Wrote:  We should all pitch in to buy an Autoblow for a member who promises to write a detailed review.

(04-19-2016 07:11 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  There is only one man of the RVF to review this product, and he is delicioustacos.

He wrote this review about a fucksleeve, largely considered his magnum opus:

https://delicioustacos.com/2013/04/29/pr...ina-silky/

I'm sure the Autoblow 2 will inspire a worthy sequel (in spirit) to the Tenga review.

I fully support this.

Post: #86

If this product is good enough, this may be a tipping point. Give it bluetooth connectivity (didn't watch the advertisement, so I don't know if it stated that it does), and boom, it's over.

Camwhores already have vibrators that are reactive to the guys tipping (with the local scrip on the website), so this is the other end of the chain. Give it less than a year before someone has figured out a way to connect a man and woman or a woman with multiple men via xbox, computer, or Obamaphone.

Proceed with caution. These are Demolition Man days:

Post: #87

I get off on the high I get from dominating a girl as much as from the physical act of sex; somehow I don't think a next gen pocket pussy is going to work for me.

Post: #88

(04-19-2016 09:40 PM)Laner Wrote:  

(04-18-2016 06:32 PM)Roosh Wrote:  We should all pitch in to buy an Autoblow for a member who promises to write a detailed review.

(04-19-2016 07:11 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  There is only one man of the RVF to review this product, and he is delicioustacos.

He wrote this review about a fucksleeve, largely considered his magnum opus:

https://delicioustacos.com/2013/04/29/pr...ina-silky/

I'm sure the Autoblow 2 will inspire a worthy sequel (in spirit) to the Tenga review.

I fully support this.

We should create a special "limited edition" badge to go next to the Gold Metal below user's names for those who chip in $15 or more towards this effort.

Post: #89

(04-19-2016 11:05 AM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  Probably beyond the scope of this thread (and I'll put some thought into hopefully starting a new one), but it seems to me that eventually feminists will have to turn on devices like this, and the VR porn industry as a whole, when they realize it will inexorably and adversely dissipate their current pool of eagerly awaiting betas who are ready to scoop them up when they are finished riding the carousel. That is a direct assault on their current safety net and power structure that they won't be able to abide.

The more realistic this stuff gets, the more betas will withdraw from the SMP. In a sense I don't blame them. The playing field is getting so skewed against them, and they will be required to put up with so much garbage just for a chance to get a past-her-prime harpy, that there's just no upside for a lot of these guys. If it's easier than self-improvement, or adopting a persona, it will be more appealing to many. This will yield a great disturbance in the penis paradise that is the current West.

Look for the seed to be planted very soon by someone like Sarkeesian that having sex with a robot or a computer program is the new act of 'super-evil misogyny' and 'opbjectification', which will eventually turn into calls on the State to legislate these programs and devices out of existence.

I can totally see this happening although I don't think it will fly since there are no real victims. Women will also have access to VR porn stuff/VR sex novels and therefore, they can't claim discrimination. The militant feminists will try but it will fall on deaf ears ultimately; especially in a Trump Presidency atmosphere of anti-political correctness.

Now, this could be interesting: this sex robot/VR tech stuff might really hit its stride right around the same time when male birth control becomes a thing (via Vasalgel). Imagine this:

1) Sex robot/VR porn keeps the betas and thristy fucks occupied.

2) The minority (players) gets male birth control and fuck chicks with zero risk of accidental babies.

3) Trump wins election and addresses false accusations abuses (i.e. enforcing due process; severe punishment for false accusers); allowing men to fuck women without the fear of legal/criminal fallout because some bitch feels slighted because you didn't return her call/she cheated on her boyfriend/ you didn't give the LTR she felt she deserved/whatever.

There is gonna be A LOT of childless women of the SJW/libtard/militant feminist variety in the near future. No betas or players to squeeze and/or trap and a cultural atmosphere that doesn't give a shit. This could really be the reality in 5-10 years.

Post: #90

I would be fascinated to know about the research and development of this product, specifically the testing phase. Do they pay a bunch of guys to try out the prototypes and give feedback? Or do they just test it themselves? I guess that in the pursuit of a device that provides the perfect blowjob, the designers would need to have had sufficient experience of real life blowjobs.

Post: #91

(04-20-2016 06:40 AM)Horus Wrote:  I would be fascinated to know about the research and development of this product, specifically the testing phase. Do they pay a bunch of guys to try out the prototypes and give feedback? Or do they just test it themselves? I guess that in the pursuit of a device that provides the perfect blowjob, the designers would need to have had sufficient experience of real life blowjobs.

As a product developer, I guarantee they have paid people to put this device on their dicks in one form or another.

As funny as it seems, these guys are gonna make bank - and as we all know, that's not as easy as "making a thing for your dick yo".

Post: #92

Quick, who wants to give me seed funding for my new business idea?

Blow-n-go, Inc., the Uber for blow jobs. There's an app to order to your location. A driver delivers the machine and waits outside. You have fifteen minutes. Flat fee with overtime charged by the minute.

Post: #93

Is there a safety release if the machine malfunctions?

Post: #94

(04-18-2016 12:26 PM)Cr33pin Wrote:  Time to move back into my moms basement

Post: #95

(04-20-2016 12:09 PM)polar Wrote:  Quick, who wants to give me seed funding for my new business idea?

Blow-n-go, Inc., the Uber for blow jobs. There's an app to order to your location. A driver delivers the machine and waits outside. You have fifteen minutes. Flat fee with overtime charged by the minute.

And you clean them as part of your service I assume.

Post: #96

(04-20-2016 12:09 PM)polar Wrote:  Quick, who wants to give me seed funding for my new business idea?

Blow-n-go, Inc., the Uber for blow jobs. There's an app to order to your location. A driver delivers the machine and waits outside. You have fifteen minutes. Flat fee with overtime charged by the minute.

Do you really think that guys are going to want to put their dick where dozens of other dicks have been?

Wait..... perhaps that's no different from a blowjob from the average women. Carry on.

Post: #97

(04-20-2016 03:34 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 12:09 PM)polar Wrote:  Quick, who wants to give me seed funding for my new business idea?

Blow-n-go, Inc., the Uber for blow jobs. There's an app to order to your location. A driver delivers the machine and waits outside. You have fifteen minutes. Flat fee with overtime charged by the minute.

And you clean them as part of your service I assume.

Nah, there are underemployed English majors for that.

And what better way for gender studies majors to get hands-on job experience?

Post: #98

(04-19-2016 01:24 AM)kinjutsu Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 01:01 AM)kamoz Wrote:  

(04-18-2016 08:08 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Cons:

• Girls might slut it up even harder to compete with an arms race with this device
  

That's a con?

Yes.
They will go to lower levels of depraved sexual behavior just to catch the attention of a man. Then they will have to perform even more taboo sexual acts in order to keep him interested.

Post: #99

(04-19-2016 10:12 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  If this product is good enough, this may be a tipping point. Give it bluetooth connectivity (didn't watch the advertisement, so I don't know if it stated that it does), and boom, it's over.

Camwhores already have vibrators that are reactive to the guys tipping (with the local scrip on the website), so this is the other end of the chain. Give it less than a year before someone has figured out a way to connect a man and woman or a woman with multiple men via xbox, computer, or Obamaphone.

Holy smokes. One camwhore giving a thousand blowjobs by robotic proxy.

You just broke the fucking world.

Post: #100

Nofap